Fertility Cares

A blog with advice, guidance and updates on fertility care

  • 10.19.09  Universal Genetic Testing

    R. Ian Hardy, M.D., Ph.D. Board-Certified Reproductive Endocrinologist, Medical Director

    By R. Ian Hardy, M.D., Ph.D., Board-Certified Reproductive Endocrinologist, Medical Director

    Hurler syndrome … Usher syndrome … Krabbe disease … Smith-Lemli-Opitz (SLO) syndrome … you’ve probably never heard of these genetic syndromes? For most infertility couples, these rare genetic diseases would not be their first thought in the infertility evaluation process. However, the first step in achieving a child – - conception – - is ultimately the combination of two separate gene pools. Within these gene pools may be rare genetic disorders that potentially can be passed on to your child and affect your child’s health and well-being. The individual incidence of many of these genetic disorders is so rare that routine testing was not practical. SLO syndrome, for example, has an incidence of 1 in 60,000. Collectively, however, there are hundreds of single gene disorders. When combining over 100 of these disorders, the collective incidence of having one of these many disorders becomes more common. In fact, on average, each person is estimated to be a carrier of approximately four recessive mutations.

    If you carry one of these autosomal recessive genetic mutations, what does this mean for your child? In autosomal recessivediseases, both mom and dad need to be carriers of the disease to pass the disease on to their child. In cases where both mom and dad are carriers, the child has a 25% (1 in 4) risk of acquiring the disease. As it turns out, the odds for both mom and dad being carriers of a rare genetic disease is very low. This low risk combined with the prohibitive screening costs historically prevented routine screening for the 100+ autosomal recessive gene disorders. It has been calculated that prior screening techniques would cost over $100,000 to screen for the 100+ gene disorders.

    Although rare, single gene disorders have been estimated to account for 10% of pediatric deaths. The vast majority of affected children had no known family history of the genetic disorder. Each year in America, approximately 8000 babies are born with sickle cell disease and more than 2,000 babies are born with cystic fibrosis; worldwide, more than 400,000 infants are born with thalassemia annually.

    Recent advances in DNA microarray chip technology have enabled a 600-fold decrease in screening cost, thus enabling a more thorough genetic screening. The Fertility Centers of New England is now offering universal genetic testing for all new patients as part of their standard evaluation. This genetic test, performed by Counsyl (www.counsyl.com) and covered my most insurances, screens for over 100 single gene disorders. These disorders include cystic fibrosis, Tay-Sachs, sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia. A full list of diseases screened with universal genetic testing can be found at https://early.counsyl.com/diseases/ .

    Typically, only the female patient is initially screened. A saliva specimen collecting kit will be mailed to your home; the collected saliva specimen is then mailed to Counsyl. If a female patient is shown to be a carrier of an autosomal recessive disease, only then would her male partner be screened. Only if both mom and dad were shown to be carriers of the same disease would further treatment be required. In cases where both partners are carriers of the same disease, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is recommended. Further information on PGD can be found on our website (http://www.fertilitycenter.com/assets/pdf/fnce_pgd.pdf ).

  • 10.13.09  Vitamin D: The “sunshine” vitamin

    Danielle Vitiello, Ph.D., M.D. Board-Eligible Reproductive Endocrinologist

    By Danielle Vitiello, Ph.D., M.D., Board-Eligible Reproductive Endocrinologist

    Vitamin D: The “sunshine” vitamin gets another look.

    Vitamin D is known to promote bone and heart health. It may provide benefit in boosting the immune system and lowering risks of certain cancers. Until recently, there have been few studies examining the effects of Vitamin D on reproductive health. Most of what is known regarding its precise activity has been studied primarily in laboratory mice and its potential role in human fertility has been inferred from these animal studies which show that Vitamin D-deficient animals demonstrate altered mating behaviors, decreased fertility rates and a lower litter size. These data suggest that although not critical for successful reproduction, Vitamin D levels and most importantly, its deficiency may affect reproductive efficiency. Furthermore, when these Vitamin D-deficient rodents are fed Vitamin D-rich diets, their reproductive capacity can be restored.
    It is only natural to take the next step and to begin to question whether Vitamin D would have similar effects in human reproduction; could the lessons from mice and rats be applied to humans? Only recently, has science begun to explore associations between Vitamin D levels and reproductive capacity. In fact there have been associations between Vitamin-D deficiency and women who have irregular menstrual cycles due to Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS). When supplemented with Vitamin D, some of these women experience a return of monthly menstrual cycles and can demonstrate fertility rates comparable to women who have regular menstrual cycles.
    Most recently, the effects of Vitamin D have been associated with reproductive outcomes in IVF. In a one study, women who demonstrated adequate Vitamin D levels faired better during IVF cycles and were more likely to become pregnant than their Vitamin D-insufficient counterparts. Although these initial studies are small, the results are promising.
    Vitamin D is not the smoking gun; low levels will not inhibit pregnancy and adequate supplementation will not insure a resultant pregnancy. Currently neither of our governing bodies, the American College of Gynecologists (ACOG) nor the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), formally recommends Vitamin D supplementation; they call for adequate folic acid intake and promote a healthful and well-balanced diet. However, if these initial studies are confirmed and the adequate presence of Vitamin D promotes a favorable IVF cycle outcome, it behooves us to take note. The measurement of Vitamin D blood-levels prior to beginning an IVF cycle is not the standard of care. Thus, women must supplement these levels empirically. Daily intake of 2000 IU of Vitamin D may provide sufficient stores to promote reproductive capacity. In the absence of kidney disease, Vitamin D supplementation is safe and hopefully will continue to demonstrate a favorable outcome in larger clinical studies. It would not be surprising to find that Vitamin D supplementation will become a welcome addition to current treatment courses that promote fertility and bring a little sunshine into our lives.

  • 09.14.09  Lifestyle Factors and Fertility

    Darlene Davies BS, Embryology

    By Darlene Davies, BS, Embryology

    WEIGHT

    An extreme in weight either too thin or too heavy is the most serious lifestyle factor adversely effecting reproductive health. Weight is defined by Body Mass Index (BMI) which comprises weight and height. The ideal body weight for pregnancy is a BMI between 19 and 28 which for 5 foot 5 inch women would be a weight between 114 and 168 pounds.

    Underweight is defined as a BMI less than 19 which is equivalent to a 5 feet 5 inch woman weighing less than 114 pounds. Infertility is more likely to occur in underweight than normal weight women due to ovulation dysfunction. The incidence of early miscarriage is also increased in underweight women most likely due to hormone imbalance.

    Obesity defined as a BMI over 30 is a prevalent medical condition in which excess body fat has accumulated to the extent that it may have an adverse effect on health. A BMI of 30-35 which for a 5 foot 5 inch woman would be a body weight of between 180 and 210 pounds may reduce life expectancy by two to four years while severe obesity defined as a BMI greater than 40 which for a 5 foot 5 inch woman would be a body weight over 210 pounds reduces life expectancy for men by as much as 20 years and five years for women. Obesity is thus the leading preventable cause of death and is the most serious public health problem in the 21st Century.

    Obesity is most commonly due to a combination of excessive dietary calories, lack of physical activity and genetic susceptibility, though a limited number of cases are due solely to genetics, medical reasons or psychiatric illness.

    Obesity is associated with many diseases particularly heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, breathing difficulties during sleep (apnea), certain types of cancers (breast and uterine), osteoarthritis, infertility and miscarriage. An elevated BMI may be associated with ovulation dysfunction, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), higher use and dosages of ovulation induction medications, poor egg and embryo quality, implantation failure and early pregnancy loss most likely due to hormone imbalance involving both excessive estrogen and androgen (male hormone) production. Men with obesity also have a higher chance of sperm abnormalities including low testosterone production, low sperm counts, low motility and poor sperm morphology.

    Poor fertilization and embryo quality and a higher chance of implantation failure and early pregnancy loss are also associated with both male and female obesity. IVF success rates have been reported to be as much as 33% less for obese women and many programs do not offer IVF services to women with a BMI over 40 due to the very low probability of a successful pregnancy. In our IVF program appropriately high successful pregnancy rates occur in women whose BMI is greater than 20 but less than 35. Obese women who do become pregnant are more susceptible to gestational diabetes, pregnancy induced hypertension; pre-eclampsia, operative delivery, birth trauma, anesthesia-related problems and poor wound healing.

    The primary treatment of obesity is dietary and physical exercise. Relatively small amounts of weight loss (average 12 to 15 pounds or greater than 5% of body weight) may be sufficient in ameliorating reproductive function in many having reproductive difficulty. Dieting may produce weight loss over the short term but keeping the weight off is difficult requiring making exercise and a lower calorie diet a permanent part of a person’s lifestyle. This is most likely the reason losing weight and keeping it off is so hard to do with long term success rates generally being less than 20%. The only effective but also most dangerous treatment for obesity due to over eating is bariatric surgery.

  • 09.02.09  ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS

    Joseph A. Hill, III, M.D. Board-Certified in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

    By Joseph A. Hill, III, M.D., Board-Certified in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

    Certain environmental exposures have been implicated in pregnancy loss and infertility. The potential for environmental and occupational exposures to chemicals and pollutants to adversely affect reproduction is not surprising since these chemicals are thought to be factors in human disease.

    The reproductive system of both males and females is sensitive to radiation causing temporary or permanent sterility, although a conventional Chest X-Ray or even a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis is not sufficient to cause harm except potentially during early pregnancy. Ionizing radiation though controversial, may also affect reproduction as flight attendants and airline pilots have been reported to have a higher incidence of early miscarriage. Risks are most likely dose and duration dependent as isolated air travel does not increase the risk for reproductive problems. Similarly there is no evidence that exposure to electrical and magnetic fields are associated with adverse reproductive outcome.

    Prolonged exposure to pesticides, heavy metals and organic solvents has been associated with sterility and pregnancy loss. Sperm counts are lower in men who have prolonged exposure to pesticides. Lower implantation rates have also been reported in women whose partners worked in occupations with high levels of organic solvents. Welders have been found to have lower sperm counts presumably due to heavy metal toxicity caused by lead and mercury.

    Other chemicals such as phthalates have also been linked to infertility. Phthalates are substances added to plastics to increase their flexibility, transparency, durability and longevity. They are used to soften polyvinyl chloride and are responsible for that ‘new car’ smell. Phthalates may be found in glues, cosmetics, certain shampoos and other personal care products such as colognes, perfumes, deodorants and hand lotions. These chemicals may affect hormone production and have been associated with birth defects, low sperm counts and DNA damage in sperm. To reduce exposure to phthalates choose food containing plastic bottles with the recycling codes 1,2 or 5 as recycling codes 3 and 7 are more likely to contain phthalates and bisophenol A, another compound which may adversely affect fertility.

  • 08.10.09  LIFESTYLE FACTORS AND FERTILITY

    Joseph A. Hill, III, M.D. Board-Certified in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

    By Joseph A. Hill, III, M.D., Board-Certified in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

     

    Potentially modifiable lifestyle factors can affect your ability to have a baby.  These factors include age, smoking, caffeine consumption, alcohol consumption, weight, diet and exposure to environmental pollutants.  We have previously reviewed the impact of aging on fertility and in this installment we review the adverse effects of smoking and infertility.

     

    SMOKING

    Smoking either by men or women can adversely affect the ability to conceive and deliver a healthy baby. In men, smoking can negatively affect sperm production, motility and the way they look (morphology). Smoking can also cause DNA damage leading to chromosome abnormal sperm. Men in couples having In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) have decreased success rates if they smoke compared to couples having these fertility procedures in which the man does not smoke.

    In women, cigarette smoking can alter hormone levels critical for successful pregnancy. Both active and passive (second-hand) smoking can hinder egg production, fertilization, and implantation. Smoking is also associated with an increased chance of miscarriage. Smoking can reduce your chances for pregnancy even with IVF. Women having IVF who smoke do not respond to ovulation induction medications as well as non-smokers. In smokers where eggs are obtained, their ability to fertilize is decreased and if they are able to fertilize, embryo quality and implantation potential are decreased compared to that in non-smokers. Twice as many IVF cycles are needed to achieve pregnancy for smokers compared with non-smokers. In one large study of 8457 women having their first IVF cycle there was a 28% decrease in having a child in smokers compared with those who did not smoke. Studies from fertility centers across the country have reported that if a woman ever smoked in her lifetime her risk of not becoming pregnant from IVF more than doubled and the risk increased with each year of smoking. Smokers who are pregnant following IVF also have twice the risk of early pregnancy loss compared to non-smokers.

  • 07.24.09  Lifestyle Factors and Fertility

    Joseph A. Hill, III, M.D. Board-Certified in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

    By Joseph A. Hill, III, M.D., Board-Certified in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

    Potentially modifiable lifestyle factors can affect your ability to have a baby. These factors include age, smoking, caffeine consumption, alcohol consumption, weight, diet and exposure to environmental pollutants. We will review the impact of these factors on fertility in the coming days and begin with the least modifiable factor, that of age.

    AGE

    The peak reproductive potential for women is age 29 with over 70% of women under age 30 trying to become pregnant successfully conceiving within three months. However, the ability to have a baby is not significantly compromised until after age 35 with only 40% of women >36 years old attempting pregnancy will actually do so within three months. Difficulty conceiving further accelerates at age 38 and by age 44 the chance of a successful pregnancy for those experiencing difficulty is less than 4%.

    Age related decline in fertility is due to multiple reasons including decreased number and quality of potentially viable eggs (oocytes), increased chance of genetically (chromosomal) abnormal eggs and increased chance of pregnancy loss (miscarriage/spontaneous abortion). Despite the evidence for age related fertility decline most people remain unaware unfortunately delaying their evaluation and treatment.

    The historical definition of infertility is one year of unprotected intercourse without producing a pregnancy. While this rigid definition may be applicable for women under age 35 who have monthly menstrual cycles, for those over 35, help from a Board Certified Reproductive Endocrinologist and Infertility Specialist should be sought after attempting pregnancy for only 6 months and right away for those age 40 and over.